Write better, score higher.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write at least 250 words.
😩 Feeling stuck? View sample answers below ⬇️ or get another random Task 2 topic.
In many places around the world, there is an ongoing debate about whether smoking should be allowed in public places. Some people argue that it is a personal choice and should be permitted, while others believe that it poses a threat to the health of non-smokers and should therefore be banned in public areas. In my opinion, smoking should be prohibited in public places due to the negative impact it has on both smokers and non-smokers.
Firstly, smoking not only affects the health of the person smoking, but it also harms those who are nearby. Secondhand smoke can lead to a range of health issues in non-smokers, including respiratory problems, heart disease, and even lung cancer. By allowing smoking in public spaces, we are putting the health of non-smokers at risk, which is unfair and unjustifiable.
Furthermore, banning smoking in public places would create a healthier and more pleasant environment for everyone. Non-smokers should not have to inhale toxic fumes when they are in public spaces such as parks, restaurants, or bus stops. By implementing a ban on smoking in these areas, we can ensure that everyone can enjoy these spaces without being exposed to harmful secondhand smoke.
Additionally, implementing a ban on smoking in public places can also encourage smokers to quit or reduce their smoking habit. When smokers are unable to light up in public areas, they may be more inclined to consider quitting altogether. This can ultimately lead to improved public health outcomes and reduce the burden on healthcare systems.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that smoking should be prohibited in public places. Not only does it pose a significant risk to the health of non-smokers, but it also has the potential to encourage smokers to quit. By implementing such a ban, we can create a healthier and safer environment for everyone.
In many societies, there is an ongoing discussion regarding whether smoking should be allowed in public places. While some argue that it is a personal choice and should be permitted, others believe that it poses a threat to the health of non-smokers and should therefore be banned in public areas. In my view, while smoking is harmful, it should not be completely banned in public places.
Firstly, it is important to recognize the rights of individuals to make their own choices, including whether or not to smoke. Banning smoking in public places could be seen as an infringement on personal freedom. While it is understood that secondhand smoke can have negative health effects, there are ways to address this without implementing a complete ban, such as designated smoking areas or improved ventilation systems.
Moreover, complete prohibition may lead to social tensions and conflicts. Smokers may feel marginalized and discriminated against if they are not allowed to smoke in public spaces. This could create a divide between smokers and non-smokers, impacting social interactions and community cohesion.
Additionally, instead of a ban, efforts should be made to educate individuals about the risks of smoking and secondhand smoke. By raising awareness and providing support for those who want to quit, it is possible to reduce the prevalence of smoking in public places without resorting to a ban.
In conclusion, while I acknowledge the health risks associated with smoking and secondhand smoke, I believe that a complete ban on smoking in public places is not the most effective approach. It is important to respect individual freedoms and find alternative solutions that can accommodate both smokers and non-smokers. Education and support for smoking cessation should be prioritized to address this issue.
You can submit your essay for free evaluation. We will provide you with your score and give you feedback on how to improve your essay.
Sign in or register to submit your essay.Or view the list of all tasks.