justIELTS

Write better, score higher.

IELTS Writing Task 2

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Many people think that fast food companies should not be allowed to advertise, while others believe that all companies should have the right to advertise. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

😩 Feeling stuck? View sample answers below ⬇️ or get another random Task 2 topic.

🤩 Sample answers

Model Essay #1:

Many people think that fast food companies should not be allowed to advertise, while others believe that all companies should have the right to advertise.

In today's modern society, there is a growing debate on whether fast food companies should be permitted to advertise their products. While some argue that such advertising should be banned, others believe that all companies, including fast food chains, have the right to advertise. In this essay, I will discuss both viewpoints and present my own perspective.

Those who advocate for banning fast food advertisements often argue that these promotions contribute to unhealthy eating habits and obesity, especially among children. Research has shown that exposure to fast food advertising can influence food preferences and consumption patterns, leading to an increased intake of high-calorie, low-nutrient foods. This can have detrimental effects on public health, particularly in communities where access to healthier food options is limited.

On the other hand, proponents of allowing fast food companies to advertise argue that such restrictions would infringe upon the freedom of businesses to market their products. They assert that consumers have the right to make their own choices and that advertising merely provides information about available options. Furthermore, they argue that imposing limitations on fast food advertising would set a precedent for regulating other industries, which could have broader implications for commercial freedom.

In my opinion, while I understand the concerns about the negative impact of fast food advertising on public health, I believe that banning such advertisements may not be the most effective solution. Instead, efforts should be focused on promoting healthier eating habits and increasing access to nutritious food options. Governments and health organizations should work with the food industry to encourage the promotion of healthier choices and educate consumers about the importance of balanced nutrition.

In conclusion, the debate over whether fast food companies should be allowed to advertise is complex. While there are valid concerns about the influence of such advertising on public health, complete prohibition may not be the best approach. It is essential to strike a balance between commercial freedom and public health interests through comprehensive strategies that promote healthier food choices.

Model Essay #2:

Many people think that fast food companies should not be allowed to advertise, while others believe that all companies should have the right to advertise.

In today's society, the issue of whether fast food companies should have the right to advertise is a topic of much debate. There are those who argue that these companies should not be allowed to advertise, while others maintain that all companies, including fast food chains, should have the freedom to advertise. In this essay, I will examine both perspectives and provide my own viewpoint on the matter.

Supporters of banning fast food advertisements often highlight the detrimental impact of such promotions on public health. They argue that these advertisements often target vulnerable groups, such as children, and contribute to the rise in obesity and unhealthy eating habits. Additionally, they point out that fast food companies frequently promote products that are high in calories, sugar, and fat, which can lead to serious health issues, including diabetes and heart disease.

On the contrary, proponents of allowing fast food companies to advertise assert that imposing restrictions on advertising infringes upon the principles of free market competition and commercial freedom. They argue that consumers have the right to make their own choices and that advertising serves as a means of providing information about products and services. Furthermore, they contend that regulating fast food advertising could set a precedent for government intervention in other industries, potentially leading to further limitations on commercial activities.

In my view, I believe that fast food companies should be restricted from advertising their products. The aggressive marketing strategies employed by these companies often target vulnerable populations, such as children, and contribute to the prevalence of unhealthy eating habits. By prohibiting fast food advertisements, we can mitigate the negative impact on public health and encourage the promotion of healthier food choices.

In conclusion, while there are arguments in favor of allowing fast food companies to advertise, the potential harm to public health outweighs the commercial freedom aspect. Restricting fast food advertisements can play a crucial role in addressing the widespread issue of obesity and promoting healthier lifestyles. It is imperative for governments to consider implementing measures that prioritize public health while maintaining a balance with commercial interests.

✍️ Evaluate your essay for free

You can submit your essay for free evaluation. We will provide you with your score and give you feedback on how to improve your essay.

Sign in or register to submit your essay.

🤓 More IELTS Writing Task 2 topics

Get a random essay topic or choose from topics below:

Or view the list of all tasks.