Write better, score higher.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write at least 250 words.
😩 Feeling stuck? View sample answers below ⬇️ or get another random Task 2 topic.
Capital punishment has been a topic of debate for many years. Some people argue that without it, our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. They believe that capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. However, I disagree with this viewpoint.
Firstly, it is important to consider the ethical implications of capital punishment. Taking someone's life as a form of punishment raises serious moral questions. It goes against the fundamental human right to life, which is enshrined in many international human rights treaties. Therefore, promoting a society that respects human rights and values life should not include capital punishment.
Moreover, there is no conclusive evidence to suggest that capital punishment effectively deters violent crimes. In fact, some studies have shown that there is no significant difference in crime rates between countries that practice capital punishment and those that do not. This indicates that the presence of capital punishment does not necessarily lead to a safer society.
Furthermore, the justice system is not infallible, and there have been cases of wrongful convictions in the past. Once a person is executed, there is no way to reverse the decision if new evidence emerges that proves their innocence. This highlights the irreversible nature of capital punishment and the potential for grave miscarriages of justice.
In conclusion, I believe that capital punishment is not essential to control violence in society. There are ethical concerns surrounding its implementation, and its effectiveness as a deterrent is questionable. Instead, efforts should be focused on addressing the root causes of crime and promoting a fair and just society for all.
Capital punishment has been a controversial issue, with some arguing that it is essential for controlling violence in society. They believe that without capital punishment, our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. I partially agree with this viewpoint.
Firstly, the presence of capital punishment serves as a deterrent for potential offenders. The fear of facing the ultimate punishment may dissuade individuals from committing violent crimes. This can contribute to a sense of security within the community, as people may think twice before engaging in criminal activities.
Additionally, capital punishment can provide a form of justice for the victims and their families. In cases of heinous crimes, such as murder or terrorism, some argue that the perpetrators deserve to face the most severe consequences for their actions. This can offer a sense of closure and retribution for the affected parties.
Furthermore, the implementation of capital punishment can send a strong message about the seriousness of certain crimes. It underscores the societal stance against acts of extreme violence and can help maintain law and order. In this way, capital punishment can act as a tool for maintaining social stability and deterring potential offenders.
In conclusion, while there are valid arguments against capital punishment, I believe that it plays a crucial role in controlling violence in society. It serves as a deterrent, provides justice for victims, and sends a clear message about the severity of certain crimes. However, it is important to ensure that its application is carried out with the utmost care and consideration for human rights.
You can submit your essay for free evaluation. We will provide you with your score and give you feedback on how to improve your essay.
Sign in or register to submit your essay.Or view the list of all tasks.