Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is often argued that individuals who have been in prison and later become good citizens are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. I strongly agree with this statement due to the valuable insights and personal experiences ex-convicts can offer to young individuals.

Firstly, former prisoners who have successfully rehabilitated themselves can serve as living examples of the consequences of criminal behavior. For instance, they can share their own stories of the challenges and hardships they faced during their incarceration, as well as the impact their actions had on their lives and the lives of their loved ones. This firsthand account can be a powerful deterrent for teenagers who may be contemplating criminal activities.

Moreover, reformed ex-convicts can provide practical advice and guidance to teenagers on how to avoid falling into a life of crime. By sharing their experiences and the steps they took to turn their lives around, they can offer valuable insights into the warning signs and pitfalls that lead to criminal behavior. This guidance can be instrumental in steering young individuals away from making poor choices and instead, towards a path of productivity and positive contribution to society.

Furthermore, ex-convicts who have successfully reintegrated into society can offer a message of hope and redemption to teenagers who may feel trapped in a cycle of delinquency. Their stories of transformation and the positive impact they are now making in their communities can serve as inspiration for young individuals who may be struggling with their own challenges and temptations.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that individuals who have been in prison and later become good citizens are indeed the best candidates to educate teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. Their personal experiences, practical advice, and message of hope can have a significant impact in deterring young individuals from engaging in criminal activities.

Model Essay #2:

Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

While it is often argued that individuals who have been in prison and later become good citizens are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime, I take the perspective that there are other effective ways to educate young individuals about this issue. I disagree with the notion that ex-convicts are the best candidates for this role due to various reasons.

Firstly, it is important to consider the potential negative impact of exposing teenagers to individuals with a criminal past. While some ex-convicts may have reformed and become law-abiding citizens, their past actions may still raise concerns about the influence they could have on impressionable young minds. It is essential to prioritize the safety and well-being of teenagers and ensure that they are not inadvertently exposed to individuals who may not serve as positive role models.

Furthermore, there are numerous professionals and community leaders who are well-equipped to effectively communicate the dangers of committing a crime to teenagers. Educators, law enforcement officers, social workers, and other mentors can provide valuable guidance and support to young individuals, drawing from their expertise and dedication to helping prevent delinquent behavior.

Additionally, there are various educational programs and initiatives that have been successful in educating teenagers about the consequences of criminal activities. These programs often incorporate interactive workshops, real-life case studies, and discussions on ethical decision-making, which can effectively convey the risks and repercussions of engaging in unlawful behavior.

In conclusion, while it is important to educate teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime, I do not agree that ex-convicts are the best individuals for this role. There are other effective and safer alternatives, including the involvement of professionals, community leaders, and specialized educational programs, which can provide valuable guidance and support to young individuals without exposing them to potentially negative influences.

justIELTS

IELTS Writing Task 2

🤩 Sample answers

Model Essay #1:

Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Model Essay #2:

Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

✍️ Evaluate your essay for free

🤓 More IELTS Writing Task 2 topics