Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources.

In today's world, there is a debate about whether governments should provide financial assistance to creative artists like painters and musicians. Some individuals argue that funding from the government is essential, while others believe that alternative sources should be responsible for supporting creative artists. This essay will discuss both viewpoints before presenting my own perspective.

Those who advocate for government funding for artists argue that creativity plays a crucial role in society and should be nurtured and supported by the state. They believe that without government support, many talented artists may struggle to make ends meet, and the world may lose out on their valuable contributions. For instance, government grants and subsidies can help artists afford necessary materials, training, and exposure to showcase their work to a wider audience.

On the other hand, proponents of alternative funding sources argue that creative artists should seek support from private patrons, art enthusiasts, or through commercial ventures. They believe that relying on the government for financial assistance can compromise an artist's independence and creativity. Moreover, funding from private sources can be more flexible and tailored to an artist's specific needs and vision.

In my opinion, a combination of both government support and alternative funding sources is ideal for the development of creative artists. While government funding can provide stability and resources for artists, seeking support from private patrons or commercial ventures can offer additional opportunities for artists to pursue their creative endeavors without bureaucratic constraints.

In conclusion, while some argue for government financial support for creative artists, others advocate for alternative funding sources. I believe that a balanced approach, with a mix of government and alternative funding, is crucial to support the flourishing of artists and their contributions to society.

Model Essay #2:

Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources.

Some people argue that governments should not allocate financial resources to support creative artists like painters and musicians. Instead, they assert that creative artists should seek funding from alternative sources. This essay will discuss both perspectives before presenting my own opinion on the matter.

Those who oppose government funding for creative artists argue that public funds should be directed towards more essential services such as healthcare and education. They believe that artists should be self-sufficient and seek funding from private patrons, art enthusiasts, or through commercial ventures. Moreover, they argue that government involvement in funding artistic endeavors may lead to favoritism or censorship, undermining the independence and creativity of artists.

On the other hand, proponents of government financial support for artists argue that creativity is an integral part of society and should be nurtured and protected by the state. They contend that without government assistance, many talented artists may struggle to pursue their passions and contribute to the cultural enrichment of society. Additionally, they believe that government funding can help ensure that the arts are accessible to a wider audience, promoting cultural diversity and understanding.

In my view, creative artists should primarily seek funding from alternative sources rather than relying on government support. By securing funding from private patrons or commercial ventures, artists can maintain their artistic independence and pursue their creative vision without external influence. Furthermore, this approach allows for a more diverse and dynamic artistic landscape, free from potential government interference.

In conclusion, while some advocate for government financial support for creative artists, I believe that artists should primarily seek funding from alternative sources. This approach can safeguard artistic independence and diversity, allowing artists to thrive and contribute to the cultural fabric of society.

justIELTS

IELTS Writing Task 2

🤩 Sample answers

Model Essay #1:

Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources.

Model Essay #2:

Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources.

✍️ Evaluate your essay for free

🤓 More IELTS Writing Task 2 topics