justIELTS

Write better, score higher.

IELTS Writing Task 2

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world. Which viewpoint do you agree with? Why? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

😩 Feeling stuck? View sample answers below ⬇️ or get another random Task 2 topic.

🤩 Sample answers

Model Essay #1:

More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world. Which viewpoint do you agree with?

In today's globalized world, there is a growing trend of qualified individuals leaving poor countries to work in specialist fields such as engineering, computing, and medicine in rich countries. Some argue that this creates a form of theft from the poorer nations, while others see it as a natural part of global labor mobility. I believe that the movement of skilled workers is a natural occurrence driven by economic opportunities and individual choices.

On one hand, those who believe that rich countries are stealing from poor countries argue that the migration of skilled workers deprives the developing nations of much-needed expertise, hindering their own development. However, it is important to recognize that individuals have the right to seek better opportunities for themselves and their families. Moreover, the skills and knowledge acquired by these individuals in rich countries can be beneficial when they return to their home countries, contributing to their development.

On the other hand, the viewpoint that this is part of the natural movement of workers around the world is supported by the principles of free market economics and individual agency. People migrate to where they can find the best opportunities, and rich countries are often able to offer higher wages, better working conditions, and advanced facilities. This movement can also lead to knowledge transfer and cultural exchange, benefiting both the host and home countries.

In conclusion, while some may argue that the migration of skilled workers is unjust, I believe it is a natural consequence of economic disparities and individual aspirations. Instead of viewing it as theft, it is essential to consider the potential benefits and to explore ways in which the skills acquired abroad can be utilized for the development of poorer countries.

Model Essay #2:

More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world. Which viewpoint do you agree with?

In today's interconnected world, the movement of qualified individuals from poor to rich countries to fill specialized roles in fields like engineering, computing, and medicine has sparked a contentious debate. Some assert that this trend amounts to theft from the poorer nations, while others view it as a natural aspect of global labor mobility. Personally, I am inclined to believe that encouraging such movement does have detrimental effects on the developing countries.

Those who argue that rich countries are stealing from poor countries emphasize the brain drain phenomenon, wherein the departure of skilled workers exacerbates the shortage of expertise in the developing nations. This can impede their progress and perpetuate their dependency on foreign aid. Furthermore, the investment made by poorer countries in educating and training these professionals is lost when they migrate to wealthier nations.

Conversely, proponents of the natural movement of workers around the world contend that individuals have the right to seek better opportunities and that their migration is driven by personal choice and economic factors. However, it is crucial to acknowledge that the allure of better salaries and working conditions in rich countries is often a result of the disparities in global economic development.

In conclusion, I am of the opinion that the migration of skilled workers from poor to rich countries does indeed result in an unjust drain of talent from the developing nations. While individual agency plays a role in this movement, it is imperative for richer nations to consider the impact on the source countries and for global policies to address this issue. Efforts should be made to ensure that the skills and knowledge acquired abroad can be utilized for the benefit of the developing countries, promoting a more equitable distribution of expertise and resources.

✍️ Evaluate your essay for free

You can submit your essay for free evaluation. We will provide you with your score and give you feedback on how to improve your essay.

Sign in or register to submit your essay.

🤓 More IELTS Writing Task 2 topics

Get a random essay topic or choose from topics below:

Or view the list of all tasks.