Write better, score higher.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write at least 250 words.
😩 Feeling stuck? View sample answers below ⬇️ or get another random Task 2 topic.
In many countries, smoking is a major public health issue. Some countries have implemented strict laws to prohibit smoking in public places, except in designated areas. In my opinion, I agree that all countries should enforce these rules for several reasons.
Firstly, secondhand smoke poses serious health risks to non-smokers. When people smoke in public places, those around them are also exposed to the harmful effects of tobacco smoke. This can lead to various health problems such as respiratory issues and even lung cancer. By implementing laws to restrict smoking in public places, countries can protect the health of their citizens.
Furthermore, smoking in public places can create an unpleasant environment for non-smokers. Many people find the smell of cigarette smoke to be offensive, and it can be particularly bothersome in enclosed spaces such as restaurants and public transportation. By restricting smoking to designated areas, non-smokers can enjoy public spaces without being subjected to the discomfort of secondhand smoke.
For example, in my own city, the government has implemented strict no-smoking policies in public places such as parks, bus stops, and outdoor dining areas. This has led to a noticeable improvement in air quality and a more pleasant experience for non-smokers who frequent these areas.
In conclusion, I believe that all countries should enforce laws to restrict smoking in public places, except in designated areas. This will help protect the health of non-smokers and create a more comfortable environment for everyone.
In some countries, there are strict regulations in place that prohibit smoking in public places, except in designated areas. While these laws aim to protect non-smokers from the harmful effects of secondhand smoke, I disagree that all countries should enforce these rules.
Firstly, individuals should have the freedom to make their own choices regarding smoking. By implementing blanket bans on smoking in public places, governments are limiting the personal freedoms of smokers. While the health risks associated with smoking are well-documented, adults should have the autonomy to decide where they smoke, as long as it does not directly harm others.
Moreover, designated smoking areas can often be impractical and inconvenient for smokers. In some cases, these areas may be poorly maintained or located in areas that are difficult to access. This can lead to frustration and discomfort for smokers who are forced to use these designated spaces.
For instance, in many European countries, there are designated smoking areas in public places such as train stations and airports. However, these areas are often crowded and lack proper ventilation, making it an unpleasant experience for smokers.
In conclusion, I believe that while the dangers of smoking are undeniable, individuals should have the freedom to smoke in public places, as long as it does not harm others. Instead of implementing blanket bans, governments should focus on providing resources and support for smokers who wish to quit, while also respecting the personal choices of individuals.
You can submit your essay for free evaluation. We will provide you with your score and give you feedback on how to improve your essay.
Sign in or register to submit your essay.Or view the list of all tasks.