justIELTS

Write better, score higher.

IELTS Writing Task 2

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not in others. Some people, therefore, think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects should not receive government funding. Would the advantages of such an educational policy outweigh the disadvantages? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

😩 Feeling stuck? View sample answers below ⬇️ or get another random Task 2 topic.

🤩 Sample answers

Model Essay #1:

Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not in others. Some people, therefore, think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects should not receive government funding. Would the advantages of such an educational policy outweigh the disadvantages?

In modern societies, there is a growing demand for specialists in certain fields, such as healthcare and engineering. Some individuals believe that governments should fund the university education of students pursuing these critical subjects, while those studying less relevant fields should not receive financial support. This essay will argue that the benefits of this educational policy outweigh the drawbacks.

Firstly, by funding students in high-demand fields, the government can ensure a steady supply of professionals in crucial sectors. For example, if the government covers the tuition fees of medical students, it is more likely that there will be an adequate number of doctors and nurses to meet the healthcare needs of the population. This, in turn, can lead to improved public health and well-being.

Secondly, this educational policy can promote economic growth and innovation. By supporting students in fields like technology and computer science, governments can drive advancements in these areas, leading to the creation of new industries and employment opportunities. This can have a positive impact on the overall economy and contribute to societal progress.

On the other hand, the main disadvantage of this approach is that it may discourage individuals from pursuing their passion and interests in fields that are considered less relevant. For instance, students interested in pursuing art, philosophy, or history may face financial barriers if government funding is restricted. This could lead to a loss of cultural and academic diversity in society.

In conclusion, the advantages of governments funding university education for students in high-demand fields outweigh the disadvantages. This policy can ensure a skilled workforce in critical sectors, drive economic growth, and innovation. However, it is crucial for governments to also value and support education in less relevant subjects to maintain diversity and preserve cultural and intellectual heritage.

Model Essay #2:

Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not in others. Some people, therefore, think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects should not receive government funding. Would the advantages of such an educational policy outweigh the disadvantages?

In contemporary society, there is a growing debate over whether governments should cover the university fees of students studying subjects that are deemed essential for the needs of the society. Some argue that this approach would be unfair to those pursuing less relevant fields. This essay will argue that the disadvantages of such an educational policy would outweigh the advantages.

Firstly, providing funding solely for students in high-demand fields could lead to a shortage of professionals in other areas. For instance, if government funding is restricted to science and technology disciplines, there may be a lack of experts in fields like literature, history, and the arts. This could result in a loss of cultural richness and diversity in society.

Furthermore, such a policy may discourage individuals from following their passions and interests. For example, a talented musician or artist may be unable to pursue their dreams if they do not receive financial support for their education. This could stifle creativity and innovation in non-essential fields, leading to a less vibrant and dynamic society.

On the other hand, proponents of this policy argue that it can lead to a more skilled workforce in critical sectors, contributing to societal progress and economic growth. However, it is important to consider the broader impact on society and the potential loss of talent and creativity in fields that are not deemed essential.

In conclusion, the disadvantages of restricting government funding to certain high-demand subjects outweigh the advantages. While it is important to ensure a skilled workforce in critical areas, it is equally crucial to value and support education in all fields to maintain cultural diversity and foster creativity and innovation. A balanced approach that recognizes the importance of all disciplines is essential for the overall well-being and progress of society.

✍️ Evaluate your essay for free

You can submit your essay for free evaluation. We will provide you with your score and give you feedback on how to improve your essay.

Sign in or register to submit your essay.

🤓 More IELTS Writing Task 2 topics

Get a random essay topic or choose from topics below:

Or view the list of all tasks.