justIELTS

Write better, score higher.

IELTS Writing Task 2

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

😩 Feeling stuck? View sample answers below ⬇️ or get another random Task 2 topic.

🤩 Sample answers

Model Essay #1:

Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

I disagree with the statement that government investment in the arts is a waste of money. While public services are essential, the arts also play a crucial role in society and should receive funding.

Firstly, the arts contribute to the cultural and social well-being of a nation. Music, theatre, and other forms of art provide entertainment and inspiration to people, promoting creativity and emotional expression. For example, the famous playwright William Shakespeare's works continue to be performed and studied worldwide, enriching the cultural heritage of humanity. Thus, investment in the arts helps to preserve and promote the unique identity of a society.

Moreover, the arts industry creates jobs and stimulates economic growth. Funding for music and theatre productions, as well as support for artists and performers, generates employment opportunities and contributes to the overall economy. In addition, the arts attract tourists and visitors, boosting the tourism sector and local businesses. For instance, popular music festivals and art exhibitions draw in crowds of people, benefiting the economy of the hosting community.

Furthermore, investment in the arts can have positive impacts on education and mental well-being. Exposure to artistic activities in schools can enhance students' creativity, critical thinking, and emotional intelligence. Additionally, participation in arts-related programs has been shown to improve mental health and provide therapeutic benefits for individuals. Therefore, government funding for the arts can contribute to a more well-rounded and healthy society.

In conclusion, while public services are crucial, government investment in the arts should not be disregarded. The arts play a significant role in enriching culture, stimulating the economy, and promoting individual well-being. Therefore, it is essential for governments to allocate funds to support the arts alongside public services.

Model Essay #2:

Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

I agree that government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Instead, the focus should be on directing funds towards public services that directly benefit the citizens.

Firstly, public services such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure are fundamental for the well-being and progress of a nation. Adequate funding for these areas ensures that essential needs of the population are met, leading to a healthier and more prosperous society. For example, investing in healthcare facilities and medical research can improve the overall health outcomes of the population, ultimately contributing to a more productive workforce and reduced burden on the healthcare system.

Furthermore, prioritizing public services over the arts is a matter of practicality and necessity. While the arts have their own value, they are often considered non-essential in comparison to services that address basic human needs. For instance, allocating resources to improve public transportation or upgrade utilities directly enhances the daily lives of citizens, addressing immediate and tangible requirements.

Moreover, government funding for the arts can sometimes be seen as a luxury rather than a priority. In times of economic hardship or when public services are underfunded, it may be more prudent to allocate resources to areas that have a more direct and measurable impact on the population. This approach ensures that taxpayer money is used efficiently and effectively to address pressing societal challenges.

In conclusion, while the arts play a significant role in society, governments should prioritize investment in public services that directly benefit the well-being and progress of their citizens. By directing funds towards essential services, governments can better address the immediate needs of the population and ensure a more sustainable and prosperous future for all.

Model Essay #3:

Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

I believe that government investment in the arts is not a waste of money. While public services are important, the arts play a crucial role in society and should receive adequate funding. In this essay, I will explain why I hold this view and provide relevant examples to support my argument.

Firstly, the arts contribute significantly to the cultural and social development of a nation. Music, theatre, and other forms of art have the power to inspire, educate, and unite people from diverse backgrounds. For example, the funding of music programs in schools can nurture the talents of young individuals and provide them with an outlet for creativity. This investment can lead to a more vibrant and culturally rich society.

Moreover, the arts industry also contributes to the economy. Theatres, concert halls, and art galleries attract tourists and generate revenue for local businesses. Additionally, artists and performers contribute to job creation and economic growth. For instance, a successful music festival can bring in substantial profits for the local community and create employment opportunities for individuals involved in organizing the event.

Furthermore, investment in the arts can have a positive impact on public health and well-being. Studies have shown that engaging with the arts can reduce stress, improve mental health, and enhance overall quality of life. For instance, art therapy has been used as a form of treatment for individuals with mental health issues, demonstrating the therapeutic benefits of the arts.

In conclusion, government investment in the arts is not a waste of money. The arts play a vital role in shaping society, contributing to the economy, and promoting well-being. Therefore, it is essential for governments to allocate funds to support the arts alongside public services, as both are integral to the overall development of a nation.

Model Essay #4:

Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

I disagree with the idea that government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. While public services are undoubtedly essential, allocating funds to the arts also holds significant value for society. In this essay, I will outline my reasons for this perspective and provide relevant examples to support my argument.

Firstly, the arts contribute to the cultural enrichment of a society. Music, theatre, and other art forms provide avenues for creative expression and reflection of societal values. For example, funding theatrical performances can preserve and promote the cultural heritage of a nation, contributing to a sense of identity and belonging among its people.

Moreover, investment in the arts can have a positive impact on education. Exposure to the arts can enhance cognitive development, creativity, and critical thinking skills among students. For instance, supporting music education in schools can lead to overall academic improvement and provide students with a well-rounded education.

Additionally, the arts industry has the potential to drive economic growth. Cultural events, art exhibitions, and music festivals can attract both local and international audiences, thereby boosting tourism and stimulating economic activity in the host region. For example, the funding of a renowned music festival can bring in substantial revenue and create employment opportunities for local residents.

Furthermore, the arts play a crucial role in promoting social cohesion and unity. Artistic endeavors have the power to bring people together, fostering a sense of community and understanding. For instance, community-based art projects can serve as platforms for dialogue and collaboration, promoting social harmony and inclusivity.

In conclusion, government investment in the arts is not a waste of money. The arts contribute to cultural enrichment, education, economic growth, and social cohesion. Therefore, it is imperative for governments to recognize the value of the arts and allocate funds to support this essential aspect of society alongside public services.

✍️ Evaluate your essay for free

You can submit your essay for free evaluation. We will provide you with your score and give you feedback on how to improve your essay.

Sign in or register to submit your essay.

🤓 More IELTS Writing Task 2 topics

Get a random essay topic or choose from topics below:

Or view the list of all tasks.