justIELTS

Write better, score higher.

IELTS Writing Task 2

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Crime is nearly always related to the environment in which it occurs. For this reason, international laws and international law courts are unrealistic and will not succeed in reducing crime levels in different countries. Discuss. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

😩 Feeling stuck? View sample answers below ⬇️ or get another random Task 2 topic.

🤩 Sample answers

Model Essay #1:

Crime is nearly always related to the environment in which it occurs. For this reason, international laws and international law courts are unrealistic and will not succeed in reducing crime levels in different countries. Discuss. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

In today's world, crime is often linked to the surroundings in which it takes place. Some argue that international laws and courts cannot effectively decrease crime rates in diverse nations. However, I disagree with this viewpoint.

Firstly, international laws and courts play a crucial role in addressing transnational crimes such as human trafficking, terrorism, and drug smuggling. These crimes transcend national borders, making it essential for countries to collaborate in combating them. For instance, the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime has facilitated global cooperation in addressing organized crime, leading to the apprehension of numerous criminals involved in human trafficking and drug trade.

Secondly, international laws and courts establish a framework for countries to align their legal systems and judicial practices, fostering a more uniform approach to combating crime. This can be seen in the European Union, where the European Court of Justice ensures that member states adhere to common legal standards, contributing to a safer and more cohesive region.

Furthermore, international laws and courts serve as a deterrent to potential criminals, as they are aware that their actions can result in prosecution beyond their home country's borders. The extradition of cybercriminals, for instance, demonstrates the effectiveness of international legal cooperation in holding perpetrators accountable for their actions.

In conclusion, international laws and courts are indispensable in addressing crime on a global scale. By promoting cooperation among nations, establishing common legal standards, and deterring criminals, they contribute significantly to reducing crime levels worldwide. Therefore, I firmly believe that international laws and courts are crucial in the fight against crime.

Model Essay #2:

Crime is nearly always related to the environment in which it occurs. For this reason, international laws and international law courts are unrealistic and will not succeed in reducing crime levels in different countries. Discuss. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Some argue that crime is largely influenced by the local environment and that international laws and courts are impractical in reducing crime levels across different countries. I agree with this perspective to a certain extent.

Firstly, crime is often rooted in local socio-economic factors, cultural norms, and governance issues, making it challenging for international laws and courts to effectively address these underlying causes. For example, poverty, political instability, and corruption can significantly contribute to high crime rates in certain regions, and addressing these issues requires targeted local interventions.

Moreover, the diversity of legal systems and cultural practices across countries makes it difficult for international laws and courts to uniformly address crime. What may be considered a crime in one country may not be deemed as such in another due to varying societal norms and values. This makes it arduous to achieve consensus on legal standards and enforcement mechanisms.

Additionally, the sovereignty of nations and their right to govern their own legal systems can be a barrier to the effectiveness of international laws and courts. Countries may be reluctant to fully comply with international legal frameworks if they perceive them as encroaching on their autonomy and national interests.

In conclusion, while international laws and courts have their merits in addressing transnational crimes, they may not be as effective in reducing crime levels in diverse countries due to the complex and localized nature of criminal activities. Localized interventions that address socio-economic disparities, governance issues, and cultural norms may be more impactful in tackling crime within specific national contexts. Therefore, I partially agree with the notion that international laws and courts may not succeed in reducing crime levels across different countries.

✍️ Evaluate your essay for free

You can submit your essay for free evaluation. We will provide you with your score and give you feedback on how to improve your essay.

Sign in or register to submit your essay.

🤓 More IELTS Writing Task 2 topics

Get a random essay topic or choose from topics below:

Or view the list of all tasks.