Write better, score higher.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write at least 250 words.
😩 Feeling stuck? View sample answers below ⬇️ or get another random Task 2 topic.
In today's interconnected world, the question of whether wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with their essential requirements like food and education is a matter of ongoing debate. From my perspective, I believe that rich and developed nations have a moral obligation to support underprivileged nations. This essay will provide reasons for this viewpoint and offer relevant examples to support it.
To begin with, it is important to recognize that poverty in one part of the world can have global repercussions. For instance, when basic needs such as food and education are lacking in a particular country, it can lead to instability, conflict, and even migration. By helping poorer nations address these fundamental needs, developed countries can contribute to global stability and security. For instance, the assistance provided by countries like the United States and European nations has played a crucial role in addressing humanitarian crises in various parts of the world, thereby ensuring regional stability.
Furthermore, supporting poorer countries in meeting their basic needs is a reflection of global solidarity and empathy. It aligns with the universal principles of fairness and compassion, demonstrating that affluent nations recognize the hardships faced by those less fortunate. For example, countries like Sweden and Norway have consistently provided aid to impoverished nations, thereby demonstrating a commitment to global equity and justice.
In conclusion, the assistance provided by wealthy nations to poorer countries in meeting their basic needs is not only a moral imperative but also contributes to global stability and solidarity. Therefore, I firmly believe that rich and developed nations should continue to support underprivileged nations in their efforts to improve their condition.
Word count: 265
While it is widely argued that wealthy nations should offer aid to poorer countries in meeting their basic needs, I hold the view that the responsibility for improving their condition primarily lies with the poorer nations themselves. In the subsequent essay, I will explain the reasons behind this perspective and provide relevant examples to support it.
Firstly, it is essential for poorer nations to take ownership of their development and work towards self-sufficiency. By relying solely on aid from wealthy nations, there is a risk of perpetuating dependence and hindering the long-term progress of the recipient country. For instance, countries like South Korea and Singapore have transformed from aid recipients to donor nations through their commitment to self-reliance and strategic development policies.
Moreover, the internal factors within poorer nations, such as governance, corruption, and mismanagement, often impede the effective utilization of aid. Without addressing these internal challenges, continued external assistance may not yield substantial improvements. For example, despite receiving significant aid, some African nations continue to grapple with issues related to governance and corruption, hindering the impact of external support.
In conclusion, while the idea of wealthy nations assisting poorer countries with their basic needs is well-intentioned, it is imperative for the poorer nations to take the lead in improving their condition. By fostering self-reliance and addressing internal challenges, these countries can pave the way for sustainable development. Therefore, I do not fully support the notion that rich and developed nations should bear the primary responsibility for helping poorer nations.
Word count: 248
You can submit your essay for free evaluation. We will provide you with your score and give you feedback on how to improve your essay.
Sign in or register to submit your essay.Or view the list of all tasks.