Write better, score higher.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write at least 250 words.
😩 Feeling stuck? View sample answers below ⬇️ or get another random Task 2 topic.
Many people argue that it is the responsibility of big corporations to offer sports and social amenities for the benefit of the nearby neighborhoods. I completely agree with this perspective due to several reasons. Firstly, providing such facilities can enhance the overall well-being of the community members. For instance, if a company constructs a public sports complex, it can encourage local residents to engage in physical activities, which can lead to better health and a stronger sense of community.
Moreover, offering sports and social facilities can contribute to the development of young people. When companies invest in facilities such as playgrounds, sports fields, or community centers, they create spaces where young individuals can learn and grow. These places can provide opportunities for mentorship, skill-building, and social interaction, which are essential for the holistic development of children and teenagers.
Furthermore, such initiatives can foster a positive relationship between big businesses and the communities they operate in. By actively contributing to the well-being of the locals, companies can improve their public image and build trust among the residents. This can result in a more harmonious and cooperative environment, benefiting both the company and the community.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that it is crucial for large corporations to provide sports and social amenities for the local populace. These initiatives not only promote physical and social well-being but also contribute to the overall development and harmony of the community. Therefore, I support the idea that companies should play an active role in providing such facilities for the betterment of the neighborhoods they are a part of.
Some individuals argue that it is not the responsibility of large companies to offer sports and social facilities for local communities. While I acknowledge the potential benefits of such initiatives, I tend to disagree with this view due to various reasons. Firstly, it is important to recognize that the primary purpose of businesses is to generate profits and create value for their shareholders. Expecting them to take on the additional burden of providing public amenities may detract from their core objectives and financial sustainability.
Moreover, the provision of sports and social facilities should ideally be the responsibility of the government and local authorities. It is their duty to allocate resources and plan for the well-being of the community. Relying on corporations to fulfill this role may lead to inconsistencies and inequalities in the availability of such amenities, as companies may prioritize areas with higher commercial interests.
Furthermore, while it is admirable for companies to engage in corporate social responsibility activities, it should not be mandated or expected of them to provide public facilities. Encouraging voluntary contributions and initiatives in this regard can lead to more genuine and meaningful efforts from businesses, rather than imposing it as an obligation.
In conclusion, while the idea of large companies providing sports and social amenities for local communities has its merits, I believe that it is not their primary responsibility. Instead, the government and local authorities should take the lead in ensuring the availability of such facilities, while companies can choose to contribute in a voluntary capacity as part of their corporate social responsibility efforts.
You can submit your essay for free evaluation. We will provide you with your score and give you feedback on how to improve your essay.
Sign in or register to submit your essay.Or view the list of all tasks.