Write better, score higher.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write at least 250 words.
😩 Feeling stuck? View sample answers below ⬇️ or get another random Task 2 topic.
In today's educational system, exams have long been used as a measure of students' performance. However, some argue that continuous assessment would be a more suitable alternative. In my opinion, I agree that exams may not be the best way to measure students' performance and that continuous assessment could be more effective.
Firstly, exams often cause a great deal of stress and anxiety for students. This can lead to a situation where students are unable to perform to the best of their abilities. On the other hand, continuous assessment allows students to demonstrate their understanding of the subject matter over a period of time, reducing the pressure of one single high-stakes exam.
Secondly, exams may not accurately reflect a student's overall understanding and knowledge. Some students may not perform well under the time constraints of an exam, but they may excel in their day-to-day work. Continuous assessment offers a more comprehensive view of a student's progress and abilities.
Furthermore, continuous assessment encourages ongoing learning and improvement. Students are motivated to stay engaged with the material throughout the course, rather than cramming for a single exam at the end. This approach fosters a deeper understanding of the subject matter and allows for more personalized feedback and support from educators.
In conclusion, I believe that continuous assessment would be a more effective way to measure students' performance compared to traditional exams. It reduces stress, provides a more comprehensive view of students' abilities, and promotes ongoing learning. As our understanding of effective education evolves, it may be time to reconsider the role of exams in our assessment methods.
While some argue that exams are an inappropriate way of measuring students' performance and should be replaced by continuous assessment, I disagree with this view. I believe that exams serve as an important tool for evaluating students' knowledge and abilities.
Firstly, exams provide a standardized and fair way to assess students' understanding of the material. Continuous assessment methods may vary in their implementation and grading, leading to potential inconsistencies. Exams, on the other hand, provide a uniform testing experience for all students, ensuring an equal opportunity for everyone to demonstrate their knowledge.
Additionally, exams prepare students for real-world challenges such as time management and handling pressure. In many professions, individuals are required to undergo high-pressure situations where they must perform under strict time constraints. Exams help students develop these crucial skills, which are essential for their future careers.
Moreover, exams offer a clear and measurable evaluation of students' progress. They provide a snapshot of a student's knowledge at a specific point in time, allowing educators to identify areas of improvement and tailor their teaching to address the needs of individual students.
In conclusion, I believe that exams are a valuable and appropriate way to measure students' performance. They offer a standardized assessment, prepare students for real-world challenges, and provide a clear evaluation of progress. While continuous assessment has its merits, exams remain a fundamental aspect of evaluating students' knowledge and skills.
You can submit your essay for free evaluation. We will provide you with your score and give you feedback on how to improve your essay.
Sign in or register to submit your essay.Or view the list of all tasks.