justIELTS

Write better, score higher.

IELTS Writing Task 2

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. Discuss both of these views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

😩 Feeling stuck? View sample answers below ⬇️ or get another random Task 2 topic.

🤩 Sample answers

Model Essay #1:

Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money.

In today's world, many languages are at the risk of disappearing as they are spoken by a very small number of people. The issue of whether governments should allocate public funds to preserve these languages is a topic of debate. While some argue that it would be a waste of money, others believe that it is crucial to save these languages. In my opinion, I believe that governments should invest in preserving endangered languages.

Those who oppose the idea of spending public money on preserving dying languages argue that it would be more practical to allocate resources to other pressing issues such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure. They believe that the funds can be put to better use in addressing more immediate needs of the society. However, it is important to recognize that language is an integral part of a community's culture and identity. When a language disappears, a significant part of a community's heritage and knowledge also fades away.

On the other hand, proponents of saving endangered languages argue that each language holds unique knowledge and wisdom that cannot be easily translated into other languages. Preserving these languages can contribute to the diversity of human knowledge and cultural understanding. For example, the efforts to revive the Maori language in New Zealand have not only preserved the language itself but also strengthened the cultural identity and pride of the Maori people.

In conclusion, while it is understandable that there are competing demands for public funds, I believe that the preservation of endangered languages is important. Governments should recognize the value of linguistic diversity and allocate resources to support the documentation, teaching, and promotion of these languages. This investment not only safeguards cultural heritage but also contributes to the enrichment of human knowledge and understanding.

Model Essay #2:

Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money.

The preservation of endangered languages is a subject that sparks a debate on whether governments should prioritize spending public funds on such efforts. While some argue for the allocation of resources to save these languages, others believe that it would be an inefficient use of public money. In my view, while it is important to acknowledge the cultural significance of languages, governments should prioritize funding for more pressing societal needs.

Those advocating against the allocation of public funds for preserving dying languages argue that governments should focus on addressing urgent issues such as poverty, healthcare, and education. They contend that the limited resources available should be channeled towards improving the overall well-being of the population. Moreover, they argue that the practical utility of these endangered languages in the modern world is limited, and thus, investing in their preservation may not yield significant benefits.

On the contrary, proponents of saving endangered languages emphasize the cultural and historical value that each language holds. They argue that languages are not just a means of communication, but they also carry unique knowledge, traditions, and ways of thinking. For instance, the preservation of indigenous languages can help in safeguarding traditional ecological knowledge related to the environment and natural resources.

In conclusion, while the preservation of endangered languages is undoubtedly important for cultural heritage, I believe that governments should prioritize the allocation of public funds to address more urgent societal needs. While efforts can be made to document and archive these languages, significant financial resources should be directed towards areas that can have a more immediate and widespread impact on the well-being and development of the society.

✍️ Evaluate your essay for free

You can submit your essay for free evaluation. We will provide you with your score and give you feedback on how to improve your essay.

Sign in or register to submit your essay.

🤓 More IELTS Writing Task 2 topics

Get a random essay topic or choose from topics below:

Or view the list of all tasks.