Write better, score higher.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write at least 250 words.
😩 Feeling stuck? View sample answers below ⬇️ or get another random Task 2 topic.
In my opinion, smoking should be banned in public places and other areas where it can affect non-smokers. I believe this because of the negative impact smoking has on people's health and the environment.
Firstly, smoking is harmful to both the smoker and those around them. Secondhand smoke can cause serious health problems for non-smokers, such as lung cancer and heart disease. By banning smoking in public places, we can protect non-smokers from the dangers of secondhand smoke.
Furthermore, smoking is harmful to the environment. Cigarette butts are one of the most commonly littered items and can take years to decompose. This not only creates an unsightly environment but also poses a threat to wildlife. By banning smoking in public areas, we can reduce the amount of litter and protect the environment.
In my own experience, I have witnessed the negative effects of smoking on people's health. Several of my family members and friends have struggled with smoking-related illnesses, and I have seen the toll it takes on their quality of life. Additionally, I have seen the impact of cigarette litter on the environment, and it is disheartening to see the damage it causes.
In conclusion, I believe that smoking should be banned in public places to protect people's health and the environment. My own experiences and observations have reinforced my belief that smoking has a detrimental impact, and banning it in public areas would be a positive step towards creating a healthier and cleaner environment for everyone.
I hold the opinion that while smoking is harmful, a complete ban may not be the most effective solution. Instead, I believe that implementing strict regulations and designated smoking areas would be a better approach.
Firstly, banning smoking entirely may lead to underground or illegal smoking activities, which could be more harmful as they would not be subject to any regulations. By allowing designated smoking areas, we can control where smoking takes place and minimize its impact on non-smokers.
Moreover, smokers should also have the right to make their own choices, as long as it does not directly harm others. By providing designated areas for smoking, we can respect the rights of smokers while also protecting non-smokers from secondhand smoke.
In my own experience, I have encountered situations where designated smoking areas have effectively minimized the impact of smoking on non-smokers. For instance, in certain public places, smoking zones have been established, and this has helped to reduce the exposure of non-smokers to secondhand smoke.
In conclusion, while I acknowledge the negative effects of smoking, I believe that a complete ban may not be the most practical solution. Implementing strict regulations and designated smoking areas would strike a balance between protecting non-smokers and respecting the rights of smokers. This approach has the potential to be more effective in managing the impact of smoking in public places.
You can submit your essay for free evaluation. We will provide you with your score and give you feedback on how to improve your essay.
Sign in or register to submit your essay.Or view the list of all tasks.