Write better, score higher.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write at least 250 words.
😩 Feeling stuck? View sample answers below ⬇️ or get another random Task 2 topic.
In many countries, the increasing population has led to a shortage of housing. This has sparked a debate on whether new towns should be constructed in the countryside or if cities should be regenerated. Both options have their own set of advantages and disadvantages.
Building new towns in the countryside can offer several benefits. Firstly, it can alleviate the housing shortage in urban areas and reduce overcrowding. Additionally, it provides an opportunity for people to live in a peaceful and natural environment, away from the hustle and bustle of city life. Furthermore, constructing new towns in the countryside can lead to the development of infrastructure and amenities in those areas, which can benefit the local communities.
However, there are also drawbacks to building new towns in the countryside. It may lead to the loss of agricultural land and natural habitats, impacting the environment and biodiversity. Moreover, the cost of developing infrastructure such as roads, utilities, and public services in rural areas can be substantial, which may strain the resources of the government.
For example, in my home country, the construction of new towns in the countryside has led to the depletion of fertile agricultural land and increased pressure on water resources. This has raised concerns about sustainability and environmental impact.
In conclusion, while building new towns in the countryside can address the housing shortage and provide a serene living environment, it is essential to carefully consider the potential environmental and economic consequences. The decision to build new towns in the countryside should be made after thorough evaluation of both the benefits and drawbacks.
(Word count: 255)
In many countries, the growing population has led to a shortage of housing, triggering a debate on whether new towns should be constructed in the countryside or if cities should be regenerated. While building new towns in the countryside has its advantages, I believe that regenerating cities offers more benefits.
Regenerating cities can lead to the revitalization of urban areas, which are already equipped with existing infrastructure, amenities, and facilities. This can result in the efficient use of resources and the preservation of agricultural land and natural habitats in the countryside. Additionally, regenerating cities can promote sustainable living and reduce urban sprawl, which is crucial for environmental conservation.
On the other hand, building new towns in the countryside may lead to the loss of agricultural land, deforestation, and increased carbon emissions due to the need for new infrastructure. Moreover, the development of new towns in rural areas may lead to the dispersion of resources and services, making it challenging to provide efficient public services to residents.
For instance, in my country, the regeneration of cities has led to the restoration of historical buildings, the creation of green spaces, and the improvement of public transportation systems. This has not only enhanced the quality of urban life but also preserved the natural landscapes and ecosystems in the countryside.
In conclusion, while building new towns in the countryside may seem like a viable solution to the housing shortage, regenerating cities can offer more sustainable and environmentally friendly options. It is essential to prioritize the conservation of natural resources and the promotion of sustainable living when addressing the housing needs of a growing population.
(Word count: 260)
You can submit your essay for free evaluation. We will provide you with your score and give you feedback on how to improve your essay.
Sign in or register to submit your essay.Or view the list of all tasks.