Write better, score higher.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write at least 250 words.
😩 Feeling stuck? View sample answers below ⬇️ or get another random Task 2 topic.
In my opinion, I disagree with the idea that foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. I believe that everyone should be charged the same amount regardless of their nationality.
Firstly, charging foreign visitors more can be seen as discriminatory. Everyone should have equal access to cultural and historical sites, regardless of where they come from. It is important to promote equality and fairness in the tourism industry. Charging different prices based on nationality can create a sense of division and inequality.
Secondly, tourism is an important source of revenue for many countries. By attracting foreign visitors, countries can boost their economy and create job opportunities. However, if foreign visitors are charged more, it may discourage them from visiting, leading to a decrease in tourism revenue. Charging the same price for everyone can encourage more people to visit, benefiting the local economy.
For example, in my own experience, I have seen how a fair pricing policy can attract more visitors. In my hometown, the local government implemented a policy of charging the same price for all visitors, regardless of their nationality. This led to an increase in the number of tourists, benefiting local businesses and the community as a whole.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that foreign visitors should not be required to pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. It is essential to promote equality and fairness in tourism, and charging different prices based on nationality can be detrimental to both the tourism industry and the local economy.
I believe that foreign visitors should be charged more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. This is because foreign visitors often have higher incomes and can afford to pay more, while local visitors may have limited financial resources.
Firstly, cultural and historical attractions are often funded and maintained by the local government using taxpayers' money. Therefore, it is reasonable to offer local residents a discounted rate as they have already contributed to the upkeep of these attractions through their taxes. On the other hand, foreign visitors who have not contributed to the local economy should pay a higher fee to help cover the costs of maintaining these sites.
Secondly, foreign visitors often have higher disposable incomes compared to local visitors. They may be willing to pay more for a unique cultural experience. By charging them a higher fee, it allows the local government to generate additional revenue that can be reinvested into preserving and improving these attractions for the benefit of both local and foreign visitors.
For instance, in many countries such as Japan and Italy, foreign visitors are charged higher entrance fees to historical and cultural sites compared to local residents. This practice has proven to be effective in generating additional revenue for the preservation of these attractions.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. This approach helps to fairly distribute the costs of maintaining these sites and can provide additional funds for further improvements. It is a practical way to ensure the sustainability and accessibility of cultural and historical attractions for everyone.
You can submit your essay for free evaluation. We will provide you with your score and give you feedback on how to improve your essay.
Sign in or register to submit your essay.Or view the list of all tasks.