justIELTS

Write better, score higher.

IELTS Writing Task 2

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution, and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations. Some people say that government should try to reduce air traffic by taxing it more heavily. Do you agree or disagree?

Write at least 250 words.

😩 Feeling stuck? View sample answers below ⬇️ or get another random Task 2 topic.

🤩 Sample answers

Model Essay #1:

Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution, and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations. Some people say that government should try to reduce air traffic by taxing it more heavily. Do you agree or disagree?

In recent years, the surge in air travel has resulted in heightened levels of noise, pollution, and the need for more airport construction. This can be attributed to the rise in budget airline travel, particularly to vacation hotspots. Some individuals argue that the government should impose higher taxes on air traffic in order to mitigate these issues. Personally, I am in agreement with this stance.

To commence, the rapid expansion of low-cost air travel has undeniably contributed to the increase in air traffic. As a consequence, noise and air pollution have become more prevalent, causing disturbances to local communities and detrimental effects on the environment. Moreover, the construction of new airports or expansion of existing ones further exacerbates these problems, leading to loss of natural habitats and increased carbon emissions.

By imposing heavier taxes on air travel, the government can effectively curtail the excessive growth of air traffic. This can be achieved by implementing environmental levies or surcharges on airline tickets. Such measures would not only serve as a deterrent to unnecessary travel but also generate revenue that can be allocated toward environmental conservation efforts and improving public transportation infrastructure, thereby offering viable alternatives to air travel.

Furthermore, higher taxation on air traffic can incentivize airlines to invest in more sustainable practices and technologies, such as cleaner aircraft and alternative fuels. This would contribute to the reduction of carbon emissions and overall environmental impact of air travel, ultimately leading to a more sustainable aviation industry.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that the government should take proactive measures to reduce air traffic by imposing heavier taxes. This approach not only addresses the environmental and societal issues associated with air travel but also encourages the adoption of more sustainable practices within the aviation sector.

Model Essay #2:

Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution, and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations. Some people say that government should try to reduce air traffic by taxing it more heavily. Do you agree or disagree?

The surge in air travel has led to an increase in noise, pollution, and the need for more airport construction. This can be attributed to the rise in low-cost airline travel, particularly to vacation destinations. Some argue that the government should impose higher taxes on air traffic to address these issues. However, I disagree with this viewpoint.

Firstly, imposing heavier taxes on air travel may disproportionately impact individuals with lower incomes who rely on affordable flights for leisure or essential travel. This could potentially limit their ability to explore new destinations, visit family, or access opportunities for personal and professional growth. In essence, higher taxes on air travel may hinder social mobility and limit the benefits of travel to a privileged few.

Additionally, the aviation industry plays a crucial role in supporting economic growth and employment. By burdening air travel with increased taxes, the government risks hindering the industry's ability to contribute to national economies. This could lead to job losses, reduced tourism revenue, and a decline in the competitiveness of airlines, ultimately impacting the overall economic well-being of a country.

Moreover, instead of resorting to heavier taxation, a more effective approach would be to incentivize and invest in sustainable aviation technologies and infrastructure. Government support for research and development in cleaner aircraft, biofuels, and improved air traffic management systems can lead to significant reductions in environmental impact without compromising accessibility to air travel.

In conclusion, while the concerns regarding noise, pollution, and airport construction due to air traffic are valid, I believe that imposing heavier taxes on air travel is not the most effective solution. It is essential for governments to explore alternative measures that promote sustainable aviation while ensuring that air travel remains accessible and beneficial for individuals and economies alike.

✍️ Evaluate your essay for free

You can submit your essay for free evaluation. We will provide you with your score and give you feedback on how to improve your essay.

Sign in or register to submit your essay.

🤓 More IELTS Writing Task 2 topics

Get a random essay topic or choose from topics below:

Or view the list of all tasks.